Monitoring and Reporting Suspicious Activity in the EU Crypto Sector: Regulatory Expectations Under MiCA and AML Frameworks
As crypto-assets become more integrated into the mainstream financial system, regulators across the European Union are tightening controls to prevent their misuse for money laundering, terrorism financing, and fraud.
With the introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), alongside existing Anti-Money Laundering Directives (AMLDs), Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) are now subject to detailed requirements for monitoring transactions and reporting suspicious activity to national authorities.
Let’s break down what this means in practice — and how crypto platforms can stay compliant while protecting user trust.
Crypto’s borderless, pseudonymous nature makes it attractive not only to innovators — but also to illicit actors. To mitigate this risk, the EU’s regulatory framework demands that CASPs:
This approach aligns crypto service providers with traditional financial institutions in their duty to detect and prevent financial crime.
While MiCA itself does not contain full AML provisions, it complements and supports obligations under the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directive (currently AMLD6) and the upcoming EU AML Regulation and AML Authority (AMLA).
CASPs and other crypto entities must meet the following core obligations:
Before monitoring can begin, firms must verify customer identities through a robust Know Your Customer (KYC) process. This includes:
CASPs must implement automated systems capable of:
Systems should be real-time, risk-based, and continuously updated as new threats emerge.
When potentially illicit activity is detected, the CASP must promptly file a Suspicious Activity Report to the relevant Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in their member state.
Reports should include:
Failure to report can result in fines or criminal liability for both institutions and individuals.
MiCA and AML rules require CASPs to maintain transaction records and SARs for at least five years. These records must be available for regulatory inspection and used to support investigations if needed.
Crypto firms must ensure that employees involved in compliance and operations are trained to:
Written internal controls and AML policies are mandatory.
The monitoring and reporting obligations apply to:
Even non-EU companies serving EU clients may fall under these obligations through passporting or local licensing.
Platforms like Spendo.com are designed with AML compliance at the core — combining user-friendly services with rigorous risk controls. Spendo.com implements:
By using Spendo.com, users can buy, store, and spend crypto knowing their activity is monitored according to EU law, and that bad actors are kept out.
The EU’s crypto regulations are not just about legal compliance — they’re about building a trustworthy and transparent digital economy. By mandating robust monitoring and reporting of suspicious activity, the EU ensures that crypto is a tool for innovation — not exploitation.
As the MiCA framework takes hold, crypto businesses must adopt a proactive compliance mindset — one that integrates risk management into the core of their operations.